Sunday, March 6, 2011

John Galliano sacked for so called anti-semitic slur


Calling someone “FUCKING JEWS”, a so-called anti-Semitic slur, lands coture honcho John Galliano, a chief designer of Paris-based brand Christian Dior, in trouble.
Now I want to ask “ Is calling someone “FUCKING JEWS” is much more heinous than brutally killing 1400 Palestinians, most of them women and children, in just one go?.
What about those Muslims who are being demonized, abused, insulted, discriminated and secluded on a daily basis Or for that matter people of any other minority religion in a particular country.?
We, and especially the Christendom and the US, need to shun this FUCKING HYPOCRISY.

Monday, February 14, 2011

The ideology of extremism is the problem; Islam emphatically is not: British PM


There is so much muddled thinking about this whole issue. On the one hand, those on the hard right ignore this distinction between Islam and Islamist extremism, and just say that Islam and the West are irreconcilable — that there is a clash of civilizations. So, it follows: We should cut ourselves off from this religion, whether that is through forced repatriation, favoured by some fascists, or the banning of new mosques, as is suggested in some parts of Europe. These people fuel Islamophobia, and I completely reject their argument. If they want an example of how Western values and Islam can be entirely compatible, they should look at what’s happened in the past few weeks on the streets of Tunisia and Cairo: Hundreds of thousands of people demanding the universal right to free elections and democracy.



The point is this: The ideology of extremism is the problem; Islam emphatically is not. Picking a fight with the latter will do nothing to help us to confront the former. On the other hand, there are those on the soft left who also ignore this distinction. They lump all Muslims together, compiling a list of grievances, and argue that if only Governments addressed these grievances, the terrorism would stop….

Internet chatrooms are virtual meeting places where attitudes are shared, strengthened and validated. In some mosques, preachers of hate can sow misinformation about the plight of Muslims elsewhere. In our communities, groups and organizations led by young, dynamic leaders promote separatism by encouraging Muslims to define themselves solely in terms of their religion. All these interactions can engender a sense of community, a substitute for what the wider society has failed to supply. Now, you might say, as long as they’re not hurting anyone, what is the problem with all this? …

So, let me end with this. This terrorism is completely indiscriminate and has been thrust upon us. It cannot be ignored or contained; we have to confront it with confidence — confront the ideology that drives it by defeating the ideas that warp so many young minds at their root, and confront the issues of identity that sustain it by standing for a much broader and generous vision of citizenship in our countries. Now, none of this will be easy. We will need stamina, patience and endurance, and it won’t happen at all if we act alone. This ideology crosses not just our continent but all continents, and we are all in this together. At stake are not just lives, it is our way of life. That is why this is a challenge we cannot avoid; it is one we must rise to and overcome.



British Prime Minister David Cameron was speaking at the Munich Security Conference, setting out his view on radicalization and so-called Islamic extremism.

Monday, January 10, 2011

Salman Taseer and his liberalism


Is it necessary to be a debauch for a person to be called as LIBERAL? but the news reports and analysis on the assassination of Salman Taser suggest so.

The Indian media and so called liberals are on an overdrive to portray Salman as god of Pakistani liberals.

Neither I am justifying nor supporting Taser's killing but media by eulogizing Taser is demonizing religionists.

A person who left his Indian wife while she was pregnant cannot justify his so called liberalism.